Tuesday, February 16, 2010

EMBARGOED: Remarks of President Barack Obama at IBEW Local 26 Headquarters Job Training Center

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

_______________________________________________________________________________________

EMBARGOED UNTIL DELIVERY

February 16, 2010

 

Remarks of President Barack Obama—As Prepared for Delivery

Nuclear Power Loan Guarantees

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

IBEW Local 26 Headquarters, Lanham, Maryland

 

Thank you for the warm welcome, and for showing me around.  This is an impressive facility, where workers are instructed on everything from the installation of sophisticated energy hardware and software, to the basics of current and resistance.

 

We need look no further than the workers and apprentices standing behind me to see the future that is possible with clean energy.  It’s a future in which skilled laborers are helping us lead in burgeoning industries.  It’s a future in which renewable electricity is fueling plug-in hybrid cars and energy efficient homes and business.  It’s a future in which we are exporting homegrown energy technology instead of importing foreign oil.  And it’s a future in which our economy is powered not by what we borrow and spend, but by what we invent and build.

 

That’s the bright future that lies ahead.  And it is one my administration is striving toward every single day.  We’ve already made the largest investment in clean energy in history, an investment that is expected to create more than 700,000 jobs across America – manufacturing advanced batteries for more efficient vehicles, upgrading the power grid so that it’s smarter and stronger, and doubling our nation’s capacity to generate renewable energy.  And after decades in which we have done little to increase the efficiency of cars and trucks, we’re raising fuel economy standards to reduce our dependence on oil while helping folks save money at the pump. 

 

But in order to truly harness our potential in clean energy, we’ll have to do more.  In the near term, as we transition to cleaner energy sources, we’ll have to make tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development.  We’ll need to make continued investments in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies, even as we build greater capacity in renewables like wind and solar.  And we’ll have to build a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in America. 

 

That’s what brings us here today.  Through the Department of Energy – under the leadership of a Nobel prize-winning physicist, Steven Chu – we are announcing roughly $8 billion in loan guarantees to break ground on the first new nuclear plant in our country in nearly three decades. It’s a plant that will create thousands of construction jobs in the next few years, and some 800 permanent jobs in the years to come.  And this is only the beginning.  My budget proposes tripling the loan guarantees we provide to help finance safe, clean nuclear facilities – and we’ll continue to provide financing for clean energy projects here in Maryland and across America.

 

Now, there will be those who welcome this announcement, and those who strongly disagree with it.  The same has been true in other areas of our energy debate, from offshore drilling to putting a price on carbon pollution.  But what I want to emphasize is this: even when we have differences, we cannot allow those differences to prevent us from making progress.  On an issue which affects our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, we cannot continue to be mired in the same old debates between left and right; between environmentalists and entrepreneurs.

 

Our competitors are racing to create jobs and command growing energy industries. Nuclear energy is no exception.  Japan and France have long invested heavily in this industry.  Meanwhile, there are 56 nuclear reactors under construction around the world: 21 in China; 6 in South Korea; 5 in India.  And the commitment of these other countries isn’t just generating jobs; it’s generating demand for expertise and new technologies.  Make no mistake: whether it is nuclear energy, or solar or wind energy, if we fail to invest in these technologies today, we’ll be importing them tomorrow.

 

Now, I know it has long been assumed that those who champion the environment are opposed to nuclear power.  But the fact is, even though we have not broken ground on a new nuclear plant in nearly thirty years, nuclear energy remains our largest source of fuel that produces no carbon emissions.  To meet our growing energy needs and prevent the worst consequences of climate change, we’ll need to increase our supply of nuclear power.  It’s that simple.  This one plant, for example, will cut carbon pollution by 16 million tons each year when compared to a similar coal plant. That’s like taking 3.5 million cars off the road.

 

On the other side, those who have long advocated for nuclear power – including many Republicans – have to recognize that we will not achieve a big boost in nuclear capacity unless we also create a system of incentives to make clean energy profitable.  That is not just my personal conclusion; it is the conclusion of many in the energy industry, including CEOs of the nation’s largest utility companies.  Energy leaders and experts recognize that as long as producing carbon pollution carries no cost, traditional plants that use fossil fuels will be more cost-effective than plants that use nuclear fuel. 

 

That is why we need comprehensive energy and climate legislation, and why this legislation has drawn support from across the ideological spectrum.  I raised this just last week with Republican congressional leaders.  I believe there is real common ground.  And my administration will be working to build on areas of agreement, so that we can pass a bipartisan energy and climate bill through the Senate.

 

None of this is to say that nuclear energy doesn’t have serious drawbacks.  As the CEOs standing behind me will tell you, nuclear power generates waste, and we need to accelerate our efforts to find ways of safely storing and disposing of that waste.  That’s why we’ve asked a bipartisan group of leaders and nuclear experts to examine this challenge.  And these plants must also be held to the highest and strictest safety standards, to answer the legitimate concerns of Americans who live near and far from these facilities.  That is an imperative. 

 

But investing in nuclear energy remains a necessary step. And what I hope is that this announcement underscores both our seriousness in meeting the energy challenge – and our willingness to look at this challenge not as a partisan issue, but as a matter far more important than politics.  Because the choices we make will affect not just the next generation, but generations to come.

 

The fact is, changing the ways we produce and use energy requires us to think anew and act anew. And it demands of us a willingness to extend our hand across old divides, to act in good faith, to move beyond the broken politics of the past.  That is what we must do. And that is what we have begun to do. 

 

Thank you.

 

###

Friday, February 12, 2010

EMBARGOED: Weekly Address: President Obama Praises Restoration of Pay-As-You-Go

 

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
______________________________________________________________________________
EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00 AM ET, SATURDAY, February 13, 2010

WEEKLY ADDRESS: President Obama Praises Restoration of Pay-As-You-Go

 

WASHINGTON – Hours after signing pay-as-you-go legislation into law, President Barack Obama praised this step towards restoring fiscal responsibility and called for both parties to set aside politics and do the hard work of addressing the deficit.  To this end, since the proposed Fiscal Commission was recently blocked in the Senate – by a handful of Republicans who had previously backed the idea -- the President will create this commission by executive order.  The President believes it is time for Washington to once again take responsibility for every dollar it spends.

 

The full audio of the address is HERE. The video can be viewed online at www.whitehouse.gov.

 

Remarks of President Barack Obama

Weekly Address

February 13, 2010

 

All across America, people work hard to meet their responsibilities.  You do your jobs, take care of your families, pay your bills.  Sometimes, particularly in tough times like these, you have to make hard choices about where to spend and where to save.  That’s what being responsible means.  That’s a bedrock value of our country.  And that ought to be a value that our government lives up to as well. 

 

Yet, over the past decade, this hasn’t always not been the case.  Ten years ago, we had a big budget surplus with projected surpluses far into the future.  Ten years later, those surpluses are gone.  In fact, when I first walked through the door, the government’s budget deficit stood at $1.3 trillion, with the budget gap over the next decade projected to be $8 trillion. 

 

Partly, the recession is to blame.  With millions of people out of work, and millions of families facing hardship, folks are paying less in taxes while seeking more services, like unemployment benefits.  Rising health care costs are also to blame.  Each year, more and more tax dollars are devoted to Medicare and Medicaid. 

 

But what also made these large deficits possible was the end of a common sense rule called “pay as you go.”  It’s pretty simple.  It says to Congress, you have to pay as you go.  You can’t spend a dollar unless you cut a dollar elsewhere.  This is how a responsible family or business manages a budget.  And this is how a responsible government manages a budget, as well. 

 

It was this rule that helped lead to balanced budgets in the 1990s, by making clear that we could not increase entitlement spending or cut taxes simply by borrowing more money.  And it was the abandonment of this rule that allowed the previous administration and previous congresses to pass massive tax cuts for the wealthy and create an expensive new drug program without paying for any of it.  Now in a perfect world, Congress would not have needed a law to act responsibly, to remember that every dollar spent would come from taxpayers today – or our children tomorrow. 

 

But this isn’t a perfect world.  This is Washington.  And while in theory there is bipartisan agreement on moving on balanced budgets, in practice, this responsibility for the future is often overwhelmed by the politics of the moment.  It falls prey to the pressure of special interests, to the pull of local concerns, and to a reality familiar to every single American – the fact that it is a lot easier to spend a dollar than save one. 

 

That is why this rule is necessary.  And that is why I am pleased that Congress fulfilled my request to restore it.  Last night, I signed the “pay as you go” rule into law.  Now, Congress will have to pay for what it spends, just like everybody else.

 

But that’s not all we must do.  Even as we make critical investments to create jobs today and lay a foundation for growth tomorrow – by cutting taxes for small businesses, investing in education, promoting clean energy, and modernizing our roads and railways – we have to continue to go through the budget line by line, looking for ways to save.  We have to cut where we can, to afford what we need. 

 

This year, I’ve proposed another $20 billion in budget cuts. And I’ve also called for a freeze in government spending for three years.  It won’t affect benefits through Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security.  And it will not affect national security – including benefits for veterans.  But it will affect the rest of the budget. 

 

Finally, I’ve proposed a bipartisan Fiscal Commission to provide recommendations for long-term deficit reduction.  Because in the end, solving our fiscal challenge – so many years in the making – will take both parties coming together, putting politics aside, and making some hard choices about what we need to spend, and what we don’t.  It will not happen any other way.  Unfortunately this proposal – which received the support of a bipartisan majority in the Senate – was recently blocked.  So, I will be creating this commission by executive order. 

 

After a decade of profligacy, the American people are tired of politicians who talk the talk but don’t walk the walk when it comes to fiscal responsibility.  It’s easy to get up in front of the cameras and rant against exploding deficits.  What’s hard is actually getting deficits under control.  But that’s what we must do.  Like families across the country, we have to take responsibility for every dollar we spend.  And with the return of “pay as you go,” as well as other steps we’ve begun to take, that is exactly what we are doing.

 

Thanks.

 

Friday, February 5, 2010

EMBARGOED: Weekly Address: President Obama Calls for New Steps to Support America's Small Businesses

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
______________________________________________________________________________
EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00 AM ET, SATURDAY, February 6, 2010

WEEKLY ADDRESS: President Obama Calls for New Steps to Support America’s Small Businesses

 

WASHINGTON – In this week’s address, President Barack Obama said that America’s small businesses are key to rebuilding the economy on a new, stronger foundation and creating jobs. He called on Republicans and Democrats in Congress to pass – without delay – a series of proposals that will help American small businesses thrive.  These proposals include using $30 billion in TARP funds to create a new Small Business Lending Fund to provide capital to community banks to increase lending to small businesses, offering a new tax credit for over one million small businesses that hire new workers or raise wages, and providing targeted support for the most innovative small businesses with the potential to export new goods and products.

 

The audio and video will be available online at www.whitehouse.gov at 6:00 am ET, Saturday, February 6, 2010.

 

Remarks of President Barack Obama

As Prepared for Delivery

Weekly Address

February 6, 2010

 

Even though our economy is growing again, these are still tough times for America.  Too many businesses are still shuttered.  Too many families can’t make ends meet.  And while yesterday, we learned that the unemployment rate has dropped below ten percent for the first time since summer, it is still unacceptably high – and too many Americans still can’t find work. 

 

But what we must remember at a time like this is that we are not helpless in the face of our difficulties.  As Americans, we make our own destiny.  We forge our own path.  And I am confident that if we come together and put aside the politics that keeps holding us back, we can do that again.  We can rebuild this economy on a new, stronger foundation that leads to more jobs and greater prosperity.

 

I believe a key part of that foundation is America’s small businesses – the places where most new jobs begin. 

 

These companies represent the essence of the American spirit – the promise that anyone can succeed in this country if you have a good idea and the determination to see it through.  And every once in awhile, these ideas don’t just lead to a new business and new jobs, but a new American product that forever changes the world.  After all, Hewlett Packard began in a garage.  Google began as a simple research project. 

 

Government can’t create these businesses, but it can give entrepreneurs the support they need to open their doors, expand, or hire more workers.  And that’s what we’ve always done in this country.  The folks at Southwest Windpower in Flagstaff, Arizona started their company in a small home.  Since getting a loan from the Small Business Administration, they’ve sold 160,000 wind turbines to about 90 different countries, and are hiring even more workers today.  When Sam Ko walked into one of the SBA’s small business development centers in Illinois, he didn’t have any business experience at all – just a patent for a new metal manufacturing technology.  He was given a loan and a business plan, and today his company is still growing, with offices all over the Midwest. 

 

Last year, the steps we took supported over 47,000 loans to small businesses and delivered billions in tax relief to small business owners, which helped companies keep their doors open, make payroll, and hire workers.  But we can and must do more.  That’s why I’ve proposed a series of steps this week to support small business owners and the jobs they create – to provide more access to credit, more incentives to hire, and more opportunities to grow and sell products all over the world. 

 

Because financing remains difficult for good, credit-worthy small businesses across the country, I’ve proposed that we take $30 billion from the TARP fund originally used for Wall Street and create a new Small Business Lending Fund that will provide capital for community banks on Main Street.  These are the small, local banks that will be able to give our small business owners more of the credit they need to stay afloat.  We should also continue to waive fees, increase guarantees, and expand the size of SBA-backed loans for small businesses.  And yesterday, I proposed making it easier for small business owners to refinance their mortgages during these tough times.

 

To give these companies greater incentives to grow and create jobs, I’ve proposed a new tax credit for more than one million small businesses that hire new workers or raise wages, as well as the elimination of all capital gains taxes on small business investment. 

 

Finally, we should provide targeted support to the most innovative small businesses – the ones with the greatest potential to export new goods and products all over the world.  A lot of these companies – like the wind turbine manufacturer I mentioned – are the foundation on which we can rebuild our economy to compete in the 21st century.  They just need a little help securing the financing they need to get off the ground.  We have every incentive to help them do that. 

 

Next week, Congress will start debating many of these proposals.  And if anyone has additional ideas to support small businesses and create jobs, I’m happy to consider them.  My door is always open.  But I urge members of both parties:  do not oppose good ideas just because it’s good politics to do so.  The proposals I’ve outlined are not Democratic or Republican; liberal or conservative.  They are pro-business, they are pro-growth, and they are pro-job.  Leaders in both parties have supported similar ideas in the past.  So let’s come together and pass these measures without delay.  Let’s put more Americans back to work, and let’s give our small business owners the support to do what they’ve always done:  the freedom to pursue their dreams and build our country’s future.  Thanks for listening. 

 

 

 

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

EMBARGOED Until Delivery: Remarks of President Barack Obama's Town Hall in Nashua-As Prepared for Delivery

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

_______________________________________________________________________________________

EMBARGOED UNTIL DELIVERY

February 2, 2010

 

Remarks of President Barack Obama—As Prepared for Delivery

Town Hall

Nashua, NH

February 2, 2010

 

Remarks As Prepared for Delivery:

 

Hello, Nashua!  It’s great to be back in New Hampshire today.  Now, as some of you might remember, I’ve spent a little time in this state.  I’ve had beers at the Peddler’s Daughter here in Nashua and manned the scoop at ice cream socials from Sunapee to Dover to Hudson.  I’ve walked Main Street in Concord, and visited with folks in all ten counties.  I even once flew into the airport in Milan, which has got to be one of the only airports with a functioning wood stove. 

 

So I’ve had the privilege of getting to know folks here in New Hampshire.  I’ve seen firsthand that spirit of independence and self-reliance.  I know how hard you all work, and how tough and resilient you all are. 

 

But I also know that folks here in New Hampshire have been tested by these last two years. 

We’ve gone through the deepest recession since the Great Depression, and folks here have had their lives uprooted by lost jobs, foreclosed homes, shuttered businesses, and vanished savings.  Many good, hard-working people who met their responsibilities are now struggling because folks on Wall Street and in Washington didn’t meet theirs. 

 

So when I took office, we knew the first thing we had to do was break the back of this recession.  That meant doing some things that weren’t easy, and that I know weren’t popular.  It wasn’t popular to prevent our financial system from collapsing by throwing a lifeline to the very Wall Street banks that helped cause this crisis in the first place.  But if we hadn’t taken these steps, the entire system could have gone down and taken our economy and millions of families and businesses with it. 

 

Because of the steps we took, the markets have stabilized.  No one’s worrying about another Great Depression like they were a year ago.  The worst of the storm has passed.  But the devastation remains.  Today, one in ten Americans still can’t find work. 

 

That is why jobs will be our number one focus in 2010.  And we’re going to start where most new jobs do – with small businesses.  These are the companies that begin in basements and garages when an entrepreneur takes a chance on his dream, or a worker decides it’s time she became her own boss.  They’re companies like ARC Energy, which I visited earlier today.  These folks are hard at work on a new manufacturing process for ultra-efficient LED lights that will make them affordable for ordinary people.  The technology they’ve created is the only of its kind in the world.  They’re this little business in a condo out on Amherst Street, and they have the potential to revolutionize an industry.  Right here in Nashua.  

 

Small businesses like ARC Energy have created roughly 65 percent of all new jobs over the past decade and a half.  And I think we should make it easier for them to open their doors, expand their operations, and hire more workers.  That’s why I’ve proposed a new tax credit for more than one million small businesses that hire new workers or raise wages – and a tax incentive for all businesses to invest in new plants and equipment.  And while we’re at it, we should eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment, so these folks can get the capital they need to grow and create jobs.

 

That’s particularly critical right now, as bank lending standards have tightened, and many small businesses are struggling to get loans.

 

That’s why today, I’m announcing a proposal to take $30 billion of the money that was repaid by Wall Street banks, and use it to create a new Small Business Lending Fund that will provide capital for community banks on Main Street.  These are the small, local banks that work most closely with our small businesses – that provide them their first loan, and watch them grow through good times and bad.  The more loans these banks provide to creditworthy small businesses, the better a deal we’ll give them on capital from this Fund.  Combined with my proposal back in December to continue waiving fees and increasing guarantees for SBA-backed loans, this will help small banks do even more of what our economy needs – ensure that small businesses are once again the engine of job growth in America.

 

This is just one example of what we’ve been doing to create jobs this past year.  As some of you might remember, last February, we passed the Recovery Act, which had three parts.  One third was tax relief for small businesses and 95 percent of working families.  One third was emergency relief like increasing unemployment benefits and helping states keep teachers and police officers from losing their jobs.  And one third was putting people to work on infrastructure, renewable energy, medical research and more. 

 

Now, I understand why some people are wondering whether the Recovery Act has really worked.  Because while these steps mean 2 million Americans are working right now who’d otherwise be unemployed, and our economy is growing again instead of shrinking – and growing at the fastest rate in 6 years – we lost 7 million jobs during this recession.  So we’ve still got a pretty big hole to fill.  And if you or a member of your family is one of those 7 million, I know it’s not particularly satisfying or reassuring to hear that it could have been a whole lot worse.

 

And because there’s no magic wand that will make economic problems that were years in the making disappear overnight, it’s easy for politicians to exploit the anger and anguish folks are feeling right now.  But I have to say, I’ve noticed that some of the very same folks in Congress who opposed the Recovery Act – and claim that it hasn’t worked – have been all too happy to claim credit for Recovery Act projects in their districts and the jobs those projects have produced.  In other words, they’ve found a way to have their cake and vote against it too.

 

So we’re making progress here, but it can’t come fast enough.  And we know that if we truly want to have long-term economic growth in this country, then we need to start addressing the struggles middle-class families have been grappling with for years, long before this recession ever hit. 

 

This past decade has been one of the toughest our middle class has faced in generations, as folks have seen their paychecks shrink and their housing prices fall, while the cost of everything from groceries to health care to college has gone up.  They’re working two jobs; they’re working longer hours – but it’s not adding up.  And a lot of people put their kids to bed at night wondering whether they’ll be able to give them the opportunities in life that they deserve.

 

I didn’t run for president to kick these challenges down the road.  I didn’t run for president to play it safe and keep my poll numbers as high as possible for the next election.  I ran to solve problems for the next generation.  I ran to get the hard things done.  And I won’t rest until businesses are hiring again, and wages are rising again, and the middle class is thriving again, and we’ve finally got an economy that works for all Americans again.  I won’t rest until we do what we know will secure our continued leadership in the 21st century global economy.  I’m not ready to cede the future to China or India or any other country.  I’m not willing to settle for second place.  Not for the United States of America.

 

But here’s the thing, Nashua: I can’t do this alone.  Democrats can’t do this alone – nor should we.  We’ve got two parties in this country.  And that’s a good thing.  It means we have heated debates and vigorous disagreements.  And messy as that is, it means bad ideas can be discarded, good ones can be made better, and we don’t go too far to any one extreme.  That’s the genius of our democracy. 

 

So I was pleased when the House Republican Caucus graciously invited me to attend their retreat last week.  For more than an hour, we had a frank conversation about the issues facing our country.  We aired some grievances.  We shared some ideas.  There were plenty of things on which we didn’t agree.  But there were also things on which we did – and many on which we should if we could just focus on solving problems instead of scoring political points. 

 

We all agree that education is the key to a twenty-first century economy.  We agree that the best anti-poverty program around is a world-class education.  So why don’t we work together to transform our schools, so that every child in America can compete with their counterparts, from Beijing to Bangalore.  Let’s work together to upgrade our community colleges, which are the gateway to a career for the children of so many working families.  And in an era when a high school diploma is no longer a guarantee of a good job, let’s make college affordable for every qualified student.  No graduate should have to pay more than ten percent of his or her income on student loans each year.  We can see to it that they don’t – and we should.

 

Republicans and Democrats may not see eye to eye on the threat of global warming, but shouldn’t we agree that American grown energy is good for our security, and that new clean energy jobs are good for our economy?  And surely, we can all agree that these jobs shouldn’t be going to China, or Germany – they should be here in America.  So let’s invest in innovation.  Let’s put people to work on solar panels and wind towers and cutting-edge batteries.  Because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy, and America must be that nation.

 

These are key parts of the foundation we need to build a better future for our families and our country.  And so is fixing a health insurance system that too often works better for the insurance industry than it does for the American people.

 

No one should be satisfied with a system that allows insurance companies to deny care to folks with pre-existing conditions, or to kick people off their plans when they get too sick.  No one should accept a system where small businesses are forced to pay outrageous premiums to get their workers covered, and seniors have big gaps in their Medicare prescription coverage.  No one should accept another decade in which health insurance premiums double and millions lose their coverage altogether.

 

These are the things I hear about every day in the letters I get – from families going bankrupt; from small businesses crushed by their health care costs.  So I won’t walk away from these efforts.  I won’t walk away from these people.  And I don’t think Congress should either.  I think we should keep working to get this done – Democrats and Republicans together.

 

Finally, shouldn’t we all agree that we have got to do something about our deficits?  These deficits won’t just burden our kids and grandkids decades from now – they could damage our markets, drive up our interest rates, and jeopardize our recovery right now

 

This isn’t how responsible families do their budgets.  When times are tough, you tighten your belts.  You don’t go buying a boat when you can barely pay your mortgage.  You don’t blow a bunch of cash in Vegas when you’re trying to save for college.  You prioritize.  You make tough choices.  And it’s time your government did the same. 

 

That’s why I’ve proposed cutting more than 120 government programs – consolidating ones that are duplicative, reducing ones that are wasteful, and eliminating those that just don’t work.  That’s why I’ve proposed to cap government spending over the next three years.  Spending related to Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and our national security will not be affected.  But all other discretionary government programs will.  And that’s why I’m grateful that both the House and Senate have now voted to reinstate the PAYGO rule that helped create those record surpluses back in the 1990s instead of the record deficits we had when I came into office.  The concept here is very simple: you pay as you go.  You want to start a new program?  Go ahead.  But you’ve got to cut another one to pay for it. 

 

That’s how we’ll make sure we’re spending your money wisely.  That’s how we’ll get our deficits under control.  And that’s something on which Democrats and Republicans should be able to agree, if we could just get past the Washington game.  Yet just last week, the Senate blocked a law I supported to create a bi-partisan Fiscal Commission that would come up with a set of recommendations for cutting our deficits in the long term – because solving this difficult challenge is something we can only do together.  But this law failed when seven Republicans who had co-sponsored this idea suddenly walked away from their own proposal after I endorsed it.  Now, it’s one thing to have an honest difference of opinion on something.  There’s nothing wrong with that.  It’s another to walk away from your responsibilities to confront the challenges facing this country because you think it’s good short-term politics.  That’s what we can’t afford. 

 

The message you all sent when you elected me, and that folks made clear this past month, is that you’re out of patience for this kind of business as usual.  You made it clear that you want us to start worrying less about our jobs and more about yours.  You want us to worry less about our elections and more about solving your problems.  And for once, you’d like your government to reflect the sense of responsibility, decency, and generosity with which you live your lives. 

 

It’s the spirit that led students here at Nashua North to spring into action in the wake of the tragedy in Haiti – planning fundraisers, selling ribbons, collecting money at lunch – all to help folks they’ve never known in a place they’ve never been.  

 

It’s the spirit that drives small business owners like Kedar Gupta, the CEO of ARC Energy.  Years before Kedar founded ARC, he co-founded a company called GT Solar with just $1,000 – and it now has 343 employees and hundreds of millions in revenue.  All along, he made sure his employees shared in the company’s profits.  When the company hit tough times, he cut his own salary first.  And when talking about his philosophy of business, he explains that many CEOs take a “Me, me and me” approach, but that his approach is about “we” – about not just benefitting himself, but lifting his employees too. 

 

We’ve come through a tough year and a tough decade, but that fundamental decency – that determination to do what’s right that has always been at the core of the American people – that should fill us all with optimism about what lies ahead.  So let’s put aside the small things.  Let’s come together and do what’s hard, and do what’s necessary to help the middle class succeed again; to give our kids a shot at their dreams again; and to fulfill the promise of this great country in our time.  Thank you, God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.

 

###

Monday, February 1, 2010

Embargoed excerpts of the President's remarks in Nashua, New Hampshire

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

_______________________________________________________________________________________

EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00AM EST TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2010

 

 

Embargoed excerpts of the President’s remarks in Nashua, New Hampshire

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

 

Jobs will be our number one focus in 2010.  And we’re going to start where most new jobs do – with small businesses.  These are the companies that begin in basements and garages when an entrepreneur takes a chance on his dream, or a worker decides it’s time she became her own boss. 

 

...

 

Small businesses like this have created roughly 65 percent of all new jobs over the past decade and a half.  And I think we should make it easier for them to open their doors, expand their operations, and hire more workers.  That’s why I’ve proposed a new tax credit for more than one million small businesses that hire new workers or raise wages – and a tax incentive for all businesses to invest in new plants and equipment.  And while we’re at it, we should eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment, so these folks can get the capital they need to grow and create jobs.

 

 

That’s particularly critical right now, as bank lending standards have tightened, and many small businesses are struggling to get loans.

 

 

That’s why today, I’m announcing a proposal to take $30 billion of the money that was repaid by Wall Street banks, and use it to create a new Small Business Lending Fund that will provide capital for community banks on Main Street.  These are the small, local banks that work most closely with our small businesses – that provide them their first loan, and watch them grow through good times and bad.  The more loans these banks provide to creditworthy small businesses, the better a deal we’ll give them on capital from this Fund.  Combined with my proposal back in December to continue waiving fees and increasing guarantees for SBA-backed loans, this will help small banks do even more of what our economy needs – ensure that small businesses are once again the engine of job growth in America.

 

 

##

 

 

EMBARGOED: President Obama to Outline New Small Business Lending Fund

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

_______________________________________________________________________________________

EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00 AM EST

February 1, 2010

 

 

President Obama to Outline New Small Business Lending Fund

New program will transfer TARP funds to increase lending to small businesses

 

WASHINGTON – On Tuesday, February 2, 2010, President Barack Obama will hold a town hall meeting in Nashua, New Hampshire where he will outline the new Small Business Lending Fund. He will be joined by Small Business Administrator Karen Mills.

 

The Small Business Lending Fund will transfer $30 billion from the Troubled Asset Relief Program to a new program that will support small business lending.  The Small Business Lending Fund will be targeted at community and smaller banks that lend the most to small businesses, and offer incentives for banks to increase small business lending.

 

In the State of the Union Address, the President outlined a series of proposals to create jobs and grow our nation’s small businesses.  Last week, President Obama outlined a new Small Business Jobs and Wages and Tax Cut to encourage hiring and create incentives for employers to increase wages for already existing employees. 

 

Key elements of the new Small Business Lending Fund are below:

 

Limited to Community and Smaller Banks Which Devote a Higher Share of Lending to Small Businesses: The Small Business Lending Fund would support lending among small- and medium-sized banks (with assets under $10 billion). These banks devote the highest percentage of their lending to small businesses in their communities, accounting for over 50 percent of all small business loans nationwide, even though they make up only about 20 percent of all bank assets.             

Program Would Be Separate and Distinct from TARP to Encourage Participation: By transferring, through legislation, $30 billion to a new program that would be distinct from TARP, the Administration’s proposal would encourage broader participation by banks, as they would not face TARP restrictions.

A Core Function of New Fund Would Be Offering Capital With Incentives to Increase Small Business Lending: The Administration’s core proposal for the new lending fund is an initiative to invest in smaller banks capital under terms that provide strong incentives to increase lending. As participating banks increase lending to small firms compared to 2009 levels, the dividend paid to Treasury on that capital investment would be reduced.

Administration Will Discuss with Congress Additional Ideas to Enhance Credit for Small Businesses Through the Small Business Lending Fund. While the Administration is presenting its plan to provide capital with an incentive structure to maximize small business lending, it looks forward to discussing with Congress other ways that – in addition to what is described above – the Small Business Lending Fund could be fully deployed.

 

A full fact sheet is attached. 

 

###

 

Friday, January 29, 2010

EMBARGOED: Weekly Address: President Obama Pledges to Rein in Budget Deficits

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
______________________________________________________________________________
EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00 AM ET, SATURDAY, January 30, 2010

WEEKLY ADDRESS: President Obama Pledges to Rein in Budget Deficits

 

WASHINGTON – In his weekly address, President Barack Obama promised to rein the deficit, citing three specific steps to this end.  He praised the Senate for restoring the pay-as-you-go law, which in the 1990’s contributed to the $236 billion surplus at the end of the decade.  It is no coincidence that after ending PAYGO, that surplus became a $1.3 trillion deficit.  He has also proposed a freeze in discretionary spending, which will increase investments in jobs creation and middle class tax cuts while cutting spending for redundant or ineffective programs.  And finally, the President called for a bi-partisan Fiscal Commission to hammer out concrete deficit reduction proposals.

 

The audio and video will be available online at www.whitehouse.gov at 6:00 am ET, Saturday, January 30, 2010.

 

Remarks of President Barack Obama

As Prepared for Delivery

Weekly Address

January 30, 2010

 

At this time last year, amidst headlines about banks on the verge of collapse and job losses of 700,000 a month, we received another troubling piece of news about our economy.  Our economy was shrinking at an alarming rate – the largest six-month decline in 50 years.  Our factories and farms were producing less; our businesses were selling less; and more job losses were on the horizon.

 

One year later, according to numbers released this past week, this trend has reversed itself.  For the past six months, our economy has been growing again.  And last quarter, it grew more quickly than at any time in the past six years. 

 

This is a sign of progress.  And it’s an affirmation of the difficult decisions we made last year to pull our financial system back from the brink and get our economy moving again. 

 

But when so many people are still struggling – when one in ten Americans still can’t find work, and millions more are working harder and longer for less – our mission isn’t just to grow the economy.  It’s to grow jobs for folks who want them, and ensure wages are rising for those who have them.  It’s not just about improvements we see in quarterly statistics, but ones people feel in their daily lives – a bigger paycheck; more security; the ability to give your kids a decent shot in life and still have enough to retire one day yourself.

 

That’s why job creation will be our number one focus in 2010.  We’ll put more Americans back to work rebuilding our infrastructure all across the country.  And since the true engines of job creation are America’s businesses, I’ve proposed tax credits to help them hire new workers, raise wages, and invest in new plants and equipment.  I also want to eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment, and help small businesses get the loans they need to open their doors and expand their operations.     

 

But as we work to create jobs, it is critical that we rein in the budget deficits we’ve been accumulating for far too long – deficits that won’t just burden our children and grandchildren, but could damage our markets, drive up our interest rates, and jeopardize our recovery right now.

 

There are certain core principles our families and businesses follow when they sit down to do their own budgets.  They accept that they can’t get everything they want and focus on what they really need.  They make tough decisions and sacrifice for their kids.  They don’t spend what they don’t have, and they make do with what they’ve got. 

 

It’s time their government did the same.  That’s why I’m pleased that the Senate has just restored the pay-as-you-go law that was in place back in the 1990s.  It’s no coincidence that we ended that decade with a $236 billion surplus.  But then we did away with PAYGO – and we ended the next decade with a $1.3 trillion deficit.  Reinstating this law will help get us back on track, ensuring that every time we spend, we find somewhere else to cut.

 

I’ve also proposed a spending freeze, so that as we increase investments in things we need, like job creation and middle class tax cuts – we cut spending on those we don’t, like tax cuts for oil companies and investment fund managers, and programs that are redundant, obsolete, or simply ineffective.  Spending related to Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected – and neither will national security – but all other discretionary government programs will.

 

Finally, I’ve called for a bi-partisan Fiscal Commission – a panel of Democrats and Republicans who would sit down and hammer out concrete deficit-reduction proposals by a certain deadline.  Because we’ve heard plenty of talk and a lot of yelling on TV about deficits, and it’s now time to come together and make the painful choices we need to eliminate those deficits. 

 

This past week, 53 Democrats and Republicans voted for this commission in the Senate.  But it failed when seven Republicans who had co-sponsored this idea in the first place suddenly decided to vote against it. 

 

Now, it’s one thing to have an honest difference of opinion about something.  I will always respect those who take a principled stand for what they believe, even if I disagree with them. 

 

But what I won’t accept is changing positions because it’s good politics.  What I won’t accept is opposition for opposition’s sake.  We cannot have a serious discussion and take meaningful action to create jobs and control our deficits if politicians just do what’s necessary to win the next election instead of what’s best for the next generation. 

 

I’m ready and eager to work with anyone who’s serious about solving the real problems facing our people and our country.  I welcome anyone who comes to the table in good faith to help get our economy moving again and fulfill this country’s promise.  That’s why we were elected in the first place.  That’s what the American people expect and deserve.  And that’s what we must deliver. 

 

Thank you.